Update slides
This commit is contained in:
parent
7c2ced0713
commit
7fb7be4116
2 changed files with 86 additions and 13 deletions
Binary file not shown.
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,67 @@
|
|||
\titlepage
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{About Me}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Doing knowledge representation research at UoA
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Computer languages for human knowledge
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\item The Semantic Web overlaps with my research
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{A Technical Writing Problem}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Thesis of papers
|
||||
\pause
|
||||
\item Typical math paper structure:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Preliminaries
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Redefine definitions from other papers
|
||||
\item Adjust definitions, use different notation, express in a equivalent, different manner
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\item The technical contributions
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\pause
|
||||
\item Consolidating papers is {\bf really} hard
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Consolidating Papers}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item First, find overlap in the preliminaries sections
|
||||
\pause
|
||||
\item Rectify differences
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item E.g. paper one calls thingamajig a thingamabob, but paper two calls them doohickeys.
|
||||
\item The combined work should use the same terms throughout for the same object
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item It should be consistent
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\pause
|
||||
\item A system to make this easier?
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item Verify that vocabulary is consistent (only one word per thing)
|
||||
\item Make sure that every technical concept is defined somewhere
|
||||
\item Enhance document with links to definintion
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{What is the Semantic Web?}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Internet of unstructured documents (current)
|
||||
\item Internet of knowledge (semantic web)
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{A Brief History of Internet ``Versions''}
|
||||
|
|
@ -50,18 +111,22 @@
|
|||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Hundreds of ``Web 2.0'' books sold
|
||||
\pause
|
||||
\item But... versions do signal a push for change
|
||||
\item But... versions do signal a push for
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item an epoch
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{What is Web 3.0?}
|
||||
\frametitle{The Semantic Web: Web 3.0}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item In the 2010s, people were pushing the Semantic Web as Web 3.0
|
||||
\item 2010s, people pushed the Semantic Web as Web 3.0
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Academics
|
||||
\item Mainly academics
|
||||
\item Low industry adoption
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
|
@ -249,7 +314,7 @@ was a 3 foot tall
|
|||
\item Someone can write a fanfic of our fanfic to cite and incorporate a new creature we define
|
||||
\item Someone browsing for stories can search to find all works that incorporate our creature
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item All usages are self-reported, therefore not susceptible to AI slop errors.
|
||||
\item If usages are self-reported, therefore not susceptible to AI slop errors.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
|
@ -271,7 +336,7 @@ was a 3 foot tall
|
|||
\begin{quote}
|
||||
``A technology dies first when people stop using it, and then again when its name is lost. ''
|
||||
\vskip 1em
|
||||
\hfill -- Unknown
|
||||
\hfill -- Made up
|
||||
\end{quote}
|
||||
\pause
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
|
|
@ -319,7 +384,7 @@ was a 3 foot tall
|
|||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Semantic Web Technologys}
|
||||
\frametitle{Semantic Web Technologies}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item RDF
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
|
|
@ -339,6 +404,14 @@ was a 3 foot tall
|
|||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{The Semantic Web in the Wild}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item ActivityPub
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{How to Get Started}
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
|
|
@ -351,11 +424,11 @@ was a 3 foot tall
|
|||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Exercise}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Annotate HTML with RDFa, then verify using an RDF extractor
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
% \begin{frame}
|
||||
% \frametitle{Exercise}
|
||||
% \begin{itemize}
|
||||
% \item Annotate HTML with RDFa, then verify using an RDF extractor
|
||||
% \end{itemize}
|
||||
% \end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue